Undoubtedly, a pregnant woman has the right to choose whether or not to have a child. Tips on How to Write an Abortion Thesis Statement Having in mind the controversy that surrounds this topic, it is no surprise that coming up with a good thesis statement presents some challenge for a number of students. Here are some tips on how to write an abortion thesis statement: Searching Widely and Deeply Once you start a thesis statement for abortion, it is very crucial to search for information.
When you open a new tab, stop for a moment or two and think about the books and other kinds of dependable sources which can be used. Even though it takes more time to find the information you have, make sure that it is not made up. You need to decipher what kind of data from the internet is not fictional. Through notes, you will find a few things that you do not need or by a twist of fate duplicated.
You need to reread the material so that you may gain an idea of what introduction you might want or that will prompt you to do more concerning searching. Have a Sturdy Introduction It is always hard to begin writing a thesis statement about abortion.
Firstly, you would want your words and sentences to be well structured as well as make the content comprehensive. The trick is for you to add some political and moral aspects of information but to be safe, keep away from mentioning the religious element and its role.
This will allow you to dodge numerous disputes and avoid annoying some readers. Email: gro. Competing interests: None declared. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract The aim of this paper is to provide a panoramic view of laws and policies on abortion around the world, giving a range of country-based examples.
It shows that the plethora of convoluted laws and restrictions surrounding abortion do not make any legal or public health sense. From this perspective, few existing laws are fit for purpose.
However, the road to law reform is long and difficult. In order to achieve the right to safe abortion, advocates will need to study the political, health system, legal, juridical, and socio-cultural realities surrounding existing law and policy in their countries, and decide what kind of law they want if any.
The biggest challenge is to determine what is possible to achieve, build a critical mass of support, and work together with legal experts, parliamentarians, health professionals, and women themselves to change the law—so that everyone with an unwanted pregnancy who seeks an abortion can have it, as early as possible and as late as necessary.
Toward a definition of decriminalization of abortion In simple terms, the decriminalization of abortion means removing specific criminal sanctions against abortion from the law, and changing the law and related policies and regulations to achieve the following: not punishing anyone for providing safe abortion, not punishing anyone for having an abortion, not involving the police in investigating or prosecuting safe abortion provision or practice, not involving the courts in deciding whether to allow an abortion, and treating abortion like every other form of health care—that is, using best practice in service delivery, the training of providers, and the development and application of evidence-based guidelines, and applying existing law to deal with any dangerous or negligent practices.
Some history Abortion was legally restricted in almost every country by the end of the nineteenth century. The most important sources of such laws were the imperial countries of Europe—Britain, France, Portugal, Spain, and Italy—who imposed their own laws forbidding abortion on their colonies. In addition, the laws of several North African and Middle Eastern countries have been influenced by French civil law; and Islamic law: the countries of North Africa and Western Asia and others with predominantly Muslim populations, and having an influence on personal law, for example, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Pakistan.
Hence, the laws had a public health intention to protect women—who nevertheless sought abortions and risked their lives in doing so, as they still do today if they have no other choice. Abortion was considered a sin or a form of transgression of morality, and the laws were intended to punish and act as a deterrent. Abortion was restricted to protect fetal life in some or all circumstances. While some prosecutions for unsafe abortions that cause injury or death still take place, far more often existing laws are being used against those having and providing safe abortions outside the law today.
Ironically, it is restrictive abortion laws—leftovers from another age—that are responsible for the deaths and millions of injuries to women who cannot afford to pay for a safe illegal abortion. This paper provides a panoramic view of current laws and policies on abortion in order to show that, from a global perspective, few of these laws makes any legal or public health sense.
The fact is that the more restrictive the law, the more it is flouted, within and across borders. Perhaps most importantly, controlling fertility has become both technically feasible and acceptable in almost all cultures today. Yet despite years of campaigning for safe abortion, the use of contraception has been completely decriminalized while abortion has not. Countries with almost no deaths from unsafe abortion are those that allow abortion on request without restriction.
This is proof that that the best way to consign unsafe abortion to history is by removing all legal restrictions and providing universal access to safe abortion. But the question remains, how do we get from where things are now to where they could and should be? Attempts to move from almost total criminalization to partial let alone total decriminalization of abortion have been slow and fraught with difficulties. Nevertheless, the need for abortion is one of the defining experiences of having a uterus.
Moreover, a growing number of governments, in both the Global North and more recently the Global South, have begun to acknowledge that preventing unsafe abortions is part of their commitment to reducing avoidable maternal deaths and their obligations under international human rights law. While some people still wish that this could be achieved through a higher prevalence of contraceptive use or post-abortion care alone, the facts are against it.
Those facts include both the occurrence of contraceptive failure among those who do use a method and the failure to use contraception, both of which are common events and sexual behaviors. The role of international human rights bodies in calling for law reform A new layer of involvement in advocacy for safe abortion, based on an analysis of how existing laws affect women and girls and whether they meet international human rights standards, has emerged in recent years.
United Nations human rights bodies—including the Human Rights Committee, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, the Committee on Economic, Social and Political Rights, the Working Group on discrimination against women in law and practice, and the Special Rapporteurs on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, the rights of women in Africa, and torture—have played an increasingly visible role in calling for progressive abortion law reform.
The ACHPR called in January for the decriminalization of abortion across Africa, in line with the Maputo Protocol, and renewed that call in January , making waves across the region. Interestingly, no human rights body has gone so far as to call for abortion to be permitted at the request of the woman, yet many have called for abortion to be decriminalized.
Do these mean the same thing? In simplistic terms, they might be differentiated like this: legalizing abortion means keeping abortion in the law in some form by identifying the grounds on which it is allowed, while decriminalizing abortion means removing criminal sanctions against abortion altogether. In that sense, abortion is legal on one or more grounds mostly as exceptions to the law in all but a few countries today, while Canada stands out as the only country to date that, through a Supreme Court decision in , effectively decriminalized abortion altogether.
However, this distinction is often not what is meant. Instead, the two terms are used interchangeably—that is, abortion may be legalized or decriminalized on some or all grounds.
No one is likely to be able to change this lack of differentiation in terminology. Nevertheless, it is crucial when recommending abortion law reform to be clear what exactly is and is not intended. I will come back to this later in the paper, after exploring the complexity of the changes being called for, no matter which of the two terms is used. The law on abortion in countries today Criminal restrictions on the practice of abortion are contained in statute law—in other words, laws passed by legislatures, sometimes as part of criminal or penal codes, which consolidate a group of criminal statutes.
In the UK, for example, abortion was criminalized in sections 58 and 59 of the Offences against the Person Act of , with one aspect further defined in the Infant Life Preservation Act of , and then allowed on certain grounds and conditions in Great Britain but not Northern Ireland in the Abortion Act, which was then amended further in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of In the Abortion Act, legal grounds for abortion are set out as exceptions to the criminal law, yet the act is still in force and still being used to prosecute illegal abortions today.
That act allows abortion on request during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, and until week 24 in cases of rape, incest, or risk to health of the fetus or the woman or girl, but it was not finally signed into law.
How states are extending liberties to the unborn — by taking them from women. Opinion More and more laws are treating a fetus as a person, and a woman as less of one, as states charge pregnant women with crimes More and more laws are treating a fetus as a person, and a woman as less of one, as states charge pregnant women with crimes Say she got in a car accident in New York or gave birth to a stillborn in Indiana : In such cases, women have been charged with manslaughter.
In fact, a fetus need not die for the state to charge a pregnant woman with a crime. Women who fell down the stairs , who ate a poppy seed bagel and failed a drug test or who took legal drugs during pregnancy — drugs prescribed by their doctors — all have been accused of endangering their children.
Such cases are rare. There have been several hundred of them since the Supreme Court issued its decision ratifying abortion rights in Roe v.
Some women did not protect themselves properly before engaging in the act of sexual intercourse, become pregnant, and explore the option of abortion. There are many women who are completely against it, however, there might be others who believe that abortion is a reasonable choice. Under the Constitutional right, a woman has the….Conclusions It should be clear that the plethora of convoluted laws and restrictions on abortion do not make any legal or public health sense. However, the guidelines were withdrawn in January due to religious and political opposition. It is either all or nothing. The number of countries in that permitted each of these grounds varied greatly by region. Safe abortion: Technical and policy guidance for health systems. An unexpected pregnancy has the potential to become the greatest blessing or an inconceivable challenge depending on the individual and her current place in life.
In some states abortion is not yet fully supported and prohibited after certain stages. The list above is just a simple example of the pro abortion arguments that have covered a wide range. Legal but not necessarily available: Abortion at state hospitals in Turkey. However, the guidelines were withdrawn in January due to religious and political opposition. Americans hold the notion that someone is either pro-abortion or anti-abortion; there is no in-between. United Nations human rights bodies—including the Human Rights Committee, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, the Committee on Economic, Social and Political Rights, the Working Group on discrimination against women in law and practice, and the Special Rapporteurs on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, the rights of women in Africa, and torture—have played an increasingly visible role in calling for progressive abortion law reform.
Opinion More and more laws are treating a fetus as a person, and a woman as less of one, as states charge pregnant women with crimes All people are subject to various restrictions on what they do with their bodies - and some of these restrictions laws against suicide or euthanasia are just as invasive. No woman can call herself free until she can choose consciously whether she will or will not be a mother. If it were up to me, all criminal sanctions against abortion would be revoked, making abortion available at the request of the only person who counts—the one who is pregnant. Americans hold the notion that someone is either pro-abortion or anti-abortion; there is no in-between.
What is she to do now? She found an old purple suitcase, put the bodies inside and got into her car. Finally, web- and phone-based telemedicine services are showing that clinic-based services are not required to provide medical abortion pills safely and effectively. Be Factual and Not Fictional In every essay, there are two sides which sit on opposite ends. Health professionals are willing to be involved before and after, but not in the abortion. However, the U.
When you open a new tab, stop for a moment or two and think about the books and other kinds of dependable sources which can be used.
Abortion according to the aspect of religion is a huge sin but this argument is not valid to an atheist, but it is still useful.
Abortion is not murder because it is not taking the life of an actual human being an actual human being. Abortion in Russia. Make your readers savvy as to why you are supporting a particular side. Canada has proved that no criminal law is feasible and acceptable. But there are general criminal laws that allow the punishment of wrongdoing—such as forcing a woman to have an abortion against her will, giving her medical abortion pills without her knowledge, or causing injury or death through a dangerous procedure. There is so much research to support both sides of the issue.